With the hints you provided, it looks to me like it would be March, 2010, pp.
64 and 46-52. There are references to articles in May, 2004 and August, 2006
also dealing with remote autotuners.
Thanks.
73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 10:50, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> In about 2010 the ARRL tested 3 remote tuners.
> I could never find that test. Searched on and off for years.
> Finally found it a couple of months ago and began updating my Excel file
> with this data, but haven't finished.
>
> Right now I am spending every spare minute out in the field measuring and
> testing new antenna designs, and not working on my web site. It will
> probably be October or November before I get back to focusing on my web.
>
> I am on vacation, wine tasting, in Bingen on the Rhein. I do not have the
> information with me. When I'm home, I'll try to remember to hunt out which
> issue of QST that was in and post it here.
>
> I'll be home tomorrow night.
>
> 73
> Rick, DJ0IP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Allen
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 3:31 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group
>
> Has anyone done similar testing on the autotuners or remote autotuners?
>
> 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Jul 18, 2016, at 00:48, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> OR... simply read the ARRL test report where the ARRL shows several
>> balanced matchboxes and their matching ranges, including the JVM.
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|