To: | topband List <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? |
From: | Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:20:06 -0900 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I've built them for 40 and 80 via his modeling years ago. Fed both up high, and both down low. High feed 'seemed better', but no real way to tell. Worked a RU station on 80 from KL7 so they do emit a signal. It was a good aerial, easy to build, with some vertical component to the pattern. On 160 it may take some bending. Fed low it's a vert with an elevated radial. Two would be better, but then so would four and so on. 73, Gary NL7Y > Wouldn't feeding it up high in the corner like that at least eliminate the > need for radials? > > 73, Mike > www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Mike Waters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Gary and Kathleen Pearse |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Mike Waters |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Gary and Kathleen Pearse |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |