Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???

To: topband List <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???
From: Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:20:06 -0900
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I've built them for 40 and 80 via his modeling years ago. Fed both up high, and 
both down low. High feed 'seemed better', but no real way to tell. Worked a RU 
station on 80 from KL7 so they do emit a signal. It was a good aerial, easy to 
build, with some vertical component to the pattern. 

On 160 it may take some bending. Fed low it's a vert with an elevated radial. 
Two would be better, but then so would four and so on.

73, Gary NL7Y

> Wouldn't feeding it up high in the corner like that at least eliminate the
> need for radials?
> 
> 73, Mike
> www.w0btu.com

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>