Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???

To: "'Gary and Kathleen Pearse'" <pearse@gci.net>, "'topband List'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???
From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:27:57 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
That's a good one for 80m from KL7!  FB!

73,
Charlie, K4OTV

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary and
Kathleen Pearse
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:22 PM
To: topband List
Subject: Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas
for160???


Oh, I left out the RU was in Antarctica.

73, Gary NL7Y

> I've built them for 40 and 80 via his modeling years ago. Fed both up
high, and both down low. High feed 'seemed better', but no real way to tell.
Worked a RU station on 80 from KL7 so they do emit a signal. It was a good
aerial, easy to build, with some vertical component to the pattern. 
> 
> On 160 it may take some bending. Fed low it's a vert with an elevated
radial. Two would be better, but then so would four and so on.
> 
> 73, Gary NL7Y
> 
>> Wouldn't feeding it up high in the corner like that at least eliminate
the
>> need for radials?
>> 
>> 73, Mike
>> www.w0btu.com
> 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>