To: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,"towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 600 Ohm Line |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:05:07 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 09:46 AM 7/29/2004 -0500, Jim Brown wrote:
>Pretty much the same here. 600 ohm balanced pair to the house. 600 ohms is pretty much a standard for audio balanced pairs. Think about it.. 3 kHz, the wavelength is around 100 km... I think you can consider a phone line (or audio cable) as a lumped component, not a transmission line. The nominal terminating impedance for phone connections IS 600 ohms (i.e. that's the impedance used in things like transformer hybrids). It's also the standard impedance used for specifying things like signal and power levels. Since the frequencies are low, the fact that the actual line impedance is much less (probably around 100 ohms, like most twisted pairs) isn't a problem, although there is the interesting fact of "loading coils" on voice grade lines (used to compensate for the capacitance of the pair). Recall that originally, all phone lines WERE open wire pairs, and fairly far apart to boot. They may well have been 600 ohm characteristic impedance (but I doubt it). _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, Lightning & corona discharge, Jim Lux |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Protecting Remote Locations, N6KJ |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 600 Ohm Line, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 600 Ohm Line, Rick Karlquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |