Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter?
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:04:23 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
4) The major issue with SWR at the transmitter is giving the transmitter a load that it is "happy" with. "Happy" means that it supplies full rated power, AND is CLEAN. Distortion rises when an amp is mismatched to its load and if it's not carefully tuned. Distortion = SPLATTER. That's why God made antenna tuners.

I think it's important to note that a tuner placed at the transmitter is performing several functions: (1) Z transformation from one complex Z value to another; and (2) creating a reflection mirror for the reflected wave that allows for re-combination with the forward wave back to the load. At the load, reflected voltage is 180 degrees out of phase with the forward voltage and both the forward and reverse currents are in phase. The tuner at the transmitter will again reverse the phase of the reflection voltage so that voltage and current of the reflected wave are in phase with the forward wave.

Before solid-state RF amp designs, our old VT amps cared little about line SWR, at least below ca. 3:1. Early link-coupled tuners and later, the classic Pi network performed functions 1 & 2 noted above. Once solid-state transceivers began incorporating built-in tuners, they were once again on an equal footing with the older VT/Pi designs. Until L. McCoy and M.C. Jones authored articles on their respective Monimatch devices in the mid '50s, ops were making efficient use of their antennas and transmitters for several decades without SWR meters. With low loss, moderate Z lines, the SWR meter was not needed. Low-loss lines in conjunction with their link or Pi networks is all that was needed.

When I started as a novice in the early '70s, I was mentored by my OM, W9EAC. Although he understood transmission line mechanics, we did not own an SWR. One day, an 8th grade friend of mine brought his Midland Monimatch to the house. We inserted the meter into the line. The SWR on my 15m Yagi was 2:1, but fed with about 75 ft of low-loss coax. My friend stated "You've got problems. Your SWR is way too high." From that day forward -- well at least until I understood transmission line mechanics, I was obsessed with SWR, despite my OM's insistence that the 2:1 SWR was not nearly the problem my "know-it-all" friend made it out to be. One day, I was happy making 15m contacts. Then all of a sudden, I was spending more time looking at the SWR meter than the S-meter.

I echo K9YC's comments about SimSmith. For those intimidated by the Smith Chart, consider starting with either TLD or TLW software. Simulating line and load conditions is easy. Then, move on up to Smith charting software.

Paul, W9AC



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>