Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Yagi gain vs rotary dipole.

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Yagi gain vs rotary dipole.
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:39:50 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Tue,11/25/2014 12:18 PM, Doug Turnbull wrote:
Surely a dipole or Yagi has a certain maximum
height beyond which not much is to be gained by going higher even for DX -
QST did a study of the optimum height for a Yagi a number of years back.
A wavelength above ground was generally best though of course by going
higher lower angles were favoured and thus perhaps at times more distant DX.
Beyond a certain height though I doubt there is that much gained unless one
switches between antennas or stacks and this is well beyond the nature of
the original question.

Earlier in this thread, I posted a link to a presentation at the Pacificon Antenna Forum about a study I did on exactly this topic, and a few others.

http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf
      I know boom length is important but are you saying that given a long
enough boom that a three element mono-band Yagi would outperform a six
element Monobander on a fifty foot boom.    The additional elements surely
do add some forward gain - some.

The well known principle is that the gain of a Yagi is dependent both on boom length AND optimization of the design. A three element 20M Yagi on a 50 ft boom would NOT be an optimized design. :)

   I know it may only be one to three dB and hard to recognize in the QSB.

One or two dB can be a lot if it gets you above the noise. I've worked a lot of DX by adding a couple of dB to my signal by carefully tuning the amp after a QSY.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>