Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Fwd: Protecting Aluminum Antennas

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Protecting Aluminum Antennas
From: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:12:08 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I don't object to this statement. Way to many ties do companies withdraw 
products because they are afraid of or already have legal action against them. 

Many times people get hurt because they don't follow instructions but they 
still sue. GE have had many products over the year that have been pulled back 
for sometimes know, many times unknown reasons. 

To mention one, GEVAC, some type of plastic used to seal small leaks in vacuum 
systems. Useful to vacuum well below 10e-10 torr. It just disappeared and their 
sales man had no idea why except it might have hurt somebody somewhere or did 
not comply to the environmental requirements in California. 

The statement "This product contains material that may cause cancer in 
laboratory animals in California" is very common and have frequently been joked 
with. A common joke is;" You better not use it in California then".

It is sad that so many products can't be use or even manufactured due to the 
impact they have when misused. For example, some time ago it was possible to 
get very efficient pesticides provided you have the licence and the right 
knowledge how to use them, but that's no loner the case as there were examples 
of misuse. The same thing with other products especially various for of 
plastics.

I don't object to the removal of dangerous products but when I see examples of 
products there the danger is misuse and not good replacement available I get 
annoyed. 

Hans - N2JFS
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Protecting Aluminum Antennas

On Sat,3/19/2016 12:57 PM, EZ Rhino wrote:
> It was probably banned because it caused cancer in laboratory rats in 
> California.

On what basis do you say that?  That sounds like uninformed propaganda 
to me. And are you saying that stuff that causes cancer is OK? Is it OK 
to put lead and mercury in places where humans can injest it?

My wife and I are both scientists, she in the area of human biology and 
me an EE. I DO believe in science and the scientific method, and I do 
NOT repeat uninformed gossip.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>