Wow this got a bit out of hand. All I suggested in the beginning was to have
the same catagories for rovers as for other stations. A limited catagory and a
low and high power catagory. Nothing really needs to be added or taken away.
Dave Wendling
kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com
Home of Palm Rover Software
http:/www.home.nycap.rr.com/nugidoors/
Bill Olson <callbill@hotmail.com> wrote:
__________
>>Why do you want to destroy VHF
>>contesting experience for the rest of us?
>
>Yeah that's it, I want to destroy VHF contesting for the rest of you. That's
>pretty stron words. How is it being "destroyed"?
>
>As far as I can tell, and I think I just said this, you are only competing
>with stations in your own region and entry class. Am I wrong about that??
>Yeah, they publish the "top ten", but as Dave said, the new internet-based
>reporting format does a lot to recognize top performances in ALL regions.
>
>I guess I just don't see a problem, except that because it is a CONTEST,
>someone has to win and someone has to lose.
>
>bill
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Take advantage of our best MSN Dial-up offer of the year ? six months
>@$9.95/month. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|