I like the proposal other than the 30 QSO limit. I can see where two 10
band rovers could cross at a grid corner and easily hit 40 QSO's and
then go on their own way. This would throw them into unlimited.
I could live with the 50%, or even 20 or 30%, but the 30 QSO option is a
bit too restrictive in my opinion. But, aside from making all rover Q's
count for zero, I'll continue roving regardless of the rules.
Not that it would effect me. I currently only have 3 bands, and very
rarely work other rovers. I would love to work 30 rover Q's!! Someday
I hope to get another 222 transverter, but the auto market is going to
have to do some recovering before I can make any improvements to the
rover station...
73
Dan
--
Amateur Radio Emergency Service, Clark County Indiana. EM78el
K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269 Check out the Rover Resource Page at:
<http://www.qsl.net/n9rla> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books
Ask me how to join the Indiana Ham Mailing list!
Nate Duehr wrote:
> Thanks for sharing Jon.
>
> All this proposal appears to do is discourage people who want to operate 7
> or more band rovers and work other rovers with that many bands.
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|