VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF
From: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:01:29 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Hi Pete, I agree. Logbook of the World has become much easier to configure and use, and I think that will help.

Something else that will help is many logging programs integrate easily with LotW which makes the interface easier still. I use the DX Lab Suite of programs for non-contest operating and logging. Just a couple mouse clicks to upload new contacts and download confirmations. Importing from contesting software like N1MM is also just a couple of mouse clicks with DX Lab Suite.

Since the June contest I have received 50 MHz LotW QSLs from 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2012. I have 277 Grids worked on 6 with only 169 having LotW confirmations, but I have seen the percentage of 6 meter contacts confirmed via LotW increase steadily since the ARRL issued my LotW-only VUCC 3 years ago.

73,

Tad Danley, K3TD

On 6/22/2014 4:36 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
42 Qs in the ARRL contest but only 11 confirmed via LOTW.  That's low.
In a RTTY contest I'd be over 50% by this long after the contest.
Even an HF contest like SS would net me more than that by now.

How can we get more VHF ops to confirm via LOTW?

Would it help if TQSL -- the app that signs your log for upload --
had been massively updated so that it makes sense?  'Cause it has.
And there's even new directions ... ones that help you actually get it set up?

http://www.arrl.org/TrustedQSL/tQSL-help/

I *have* managed to scrape together 100 credits in LOTW to get VUCC on
50 MHz but I have over 200 grids worked and I really want those endorsement
stickers.  :-)

So, what to do?



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>