If you're really into homebrewing and feeling adventurous, try the KK7B
R2/T2, mini-R2/T2 or micro-R2/T2 combinations. You can add as many bells
and whistels as you want. I've been working on a version that operates on
144 MHz as an IF rig. I still have a couple bugs to get rid of (layout of
components is really critical with these designs). But I'm also thinking of
making a 28 MHz version as an IF radio for 50 through 432 MHz. Performance
is quite impressive.
You can make a very small and lightweight radio with these.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Steve Kavanagh <sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca>
wrote:
> Dan:
>
> I've used the HTX-100 in the past on 50/222/432, with a mod to get low
> power out. It works, but does have its limitations as Zack says. Mine is
> also a bit sensitive to low battery voltage (resulting in chirp and FMing
> on SSB). And it tends to need to have the microprocessor rebooted after it
> has been unpowered for a while (instructions are in the manual).
>
> I much prefer the K2 I have used recently on 50, 222, 432 and 903 MHz in
> the rover and on 2m in my CQ WW VHF FN05 operations. It works fine down to
> 9V or so. It can be set to read out the VHF/UHF frequency directly,
> including compensating for up to a few kHz of LO offset. The drawbacks are
> that it costs at least 5 times as much as an HTX-100 on the used market,
> and you will be very unlikely to find a used one with the transverter
> interface board installed if you use a 1 mW TX level (and may have to look
> around a bit to find one with the SSB transmit board). And it is a bit
> bigger than the HTX-100.
>
> 73,
> Steve VE3SMA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|