VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and VHF contests

To: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and VHF contests
From: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Reply-to: alex@kr1st.com
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:54:49 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Hi John,

If you would want to assign different QSO points based on mode, then you would have to weigh grid multipliers by mode as well. Working a distant grid on CW is a lot easier than on SSB, for instance. This can get complicated real fast. :)

73,
--Alex KR1ST


On 2019-09-20 00:03, John Kludt wrote:

"A good SSB operator can make Q's at about twice the
rate of a good  CW operator so it is a mathematical way to level the
playing field." If that logic were applied to VHF contesting digital Q's should actually be worth *more* than SSB Q's and maybe on a par with CW
Q's.  Right now as we all know there is no differential between Q's by
mode. And maybe it should stay that way - just get that grid anyway you
can!
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>