[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Defibrillator and RF Exposure Query

To: "RFI List" <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Defibrillator and RF Exposure Query
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 03:49:20 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On Tue, 9 May 2006 22:18:02 GMT, N6KI Dennis wrote:

>Can anyone address this issue

An important part of any mechanism for RF getting into a device is the length 
any conductors that could function as receiving antennas within the device (or 
connected to it) as a function of the wavelength of the interfering signal.  
subject's body, of course, could be part of that, and it would be a better 
antenna if it were touching other large conductors (or grounded objects). 

Example: An unbalanced miniature electret mic capsule with FET preamp suspended 
above a choir almost never detects RF (I don't know of any instances). On the 
other hand, an impedance converter/line driver located 10-30 ft along the line 
from the capsule and driving a long mic cable is QUITE susceptible to RF. 
Likewise, a professional mic with poor immunity connected to a long mic cable 
and sitting on a stand across the road from a 50 kW AM transmitter won't detect 
it, but it will if someone standing on the ground grips the mic to complete a  
path for RF current through the mic. Some of these tests are described in AES 
papers on my website. 

Inverse square law, of course, will apply, so any antenna system that maximizes 
the distance between the subject and the antenna and keeps RF off of the 
feedline would be better than one that does not. In other words, I would try to 
stick with well matched resonant dipoles with good baluns and coax, and operate 
on the lower HF bands. And, of course, many hams have lots of fun running QRP. 


Jim Brown K9YC

RFI mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>