On Tue, 9 May 2006 22:18:02 GMT, N6KI Dennis wrote:
>Can anyone address this issue
An important part of any mechanism for RF getting into a device is the length
any conductors that could function as receiving antennas within the device (or
connected to it) as a function of the wavelength of the interfering signal.
subject's body, of course, could be part of that, and it would be a better
antenna if it were touching other large conductors (or grounded objects).
Example: An unbalanced miniature electret mic capsule with FET preamp suspended
above a choir almost never detects RF (I don't know of any instances). On the
other hand, an impedance converter/line driver located 10-30 ft along the line
from the capsule and driving a long mic cable is QUITE susceptible to RF.
Likewise, a professional mic with poor immunity connected to a long mic cable
and sitting on a stand across the road from a 50 kW AM transmitter won't detect
it, but it will if someone standing on the ground grips the mic to complete a
path for RF current through the mic. Some of these tests are described in AES
papers on my website.
Inverse square law, of course, will apply, so any antenna system that maximizes
the distance between the subject and the antenna and keeps RF off of the
feedline would be better than one that does not. In other words, I would try to
stick with well matched resonant dipoles with good baluns and coax, and operate
on the lower HF bands. And, of course, many hams have lots of fun running QRP.
Jim Brown K9YC
RFI mailing list