Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65
From: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 19:58:01 EDT
In a message dated 98-08-09 19:46:45 EDT, aa6eg@cv.tmx.com writes:

> What kinds of limits
>  are there for 135 ft of Rohn 55, that would be more easily handled by the
>  rohn 65?  Will the 55 probably handle all our needs?  I do not anticipate
>  any 80 meter beam needs....

      You guys are nothing if not ambitious.

     130 feet of 55G @ 70 MPH will handle 32.8 sq.ft. of antennas and weighs
95 pounds per section.

     130 feet of 65G @ 70 MPH will handle 60.8 sq.ft. of antennas and weighs
290 pounds per section. 

     I can't think of any reason to use 65G even in an aggressive ham antenna
system. 65G is commercial grade where you're going to have a populated tower
with dishes and lots of other antennas, mounts, etc. You obviously haven't
priced them yet either. 

      A Rohn catalog is available for your research from Champion Radio
Products (http://www.championradio.com or 888-833-3104). The Commercial
Catalog is the one that has 65G in it and it runs ten bucks.

Cheers,  Steve   K7LXC

Champion Radio Products

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>