| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65 |
| From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com) |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 1998 10:16:59 EDT |
In a message dated 98-08-10 01:29:02 EDT, wa7fab@cdsnet.net writes:
> On one of my
> communication sites I have two hundred feet of 55 guyed at three
> levels. The top of couple of sections carry a six bay FM station
> antenna and from there on down to the thirty foot level it is totally
> loaded with antennas for all types of commercial users including another
> three bay FM station antenna.. Its on a mountain top about sixty air
> miles east of the Oregon coast, subjected to strong winds and some
> icing in the winter with never a problem. I can't imagine needing
> anything larger than 55 for any reasonable ham installation. Provided
> its guyed properly. The Rohn tower brochure has all the specs and
> guying information.
Just for the record, the Rohn 55G specs call for four sets of guys @ 70
MPH and five sets for 90 MPH. Some of the coastal counties are in the 80-85
MPH range so that would have been the safe spec to use.
Cheers, Steve K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] 25G Rotator Plate., Kurt Andress |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] 25G Rotator Plate., K7LXC@aol.com |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Towers & Trees, Barry Kutner |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65, John Brosnahan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |