Thor, good points, but I have been led to believe the Carolina Windom also
has a vertical-radiation element as well, is this not correct?
thanks! 73.......k6sdw
>From: Thor Hallen <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Multiband wire antennas
To: <[email protected]>
>Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:44:43 -0800
>Received: from [209.140.206.250] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBC443F090022D820F3B7D18CCEFA08D80; Fri Feb 02 09:53:15 2001
>Received: from contesting.com [216.1.128.73] by mail.arrl.net with ESMTP
>(SMTPD32-6.00) id A4165E100F4; Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:53:26 -0500
>Received: from dayton.akorn.net (dayton.akorn.net [216.1.128.73])by
>contesting.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f12HpB926363;Fri, 2 Feb 2001
>12:51:11 -0500 (EST)
>Received: by dayton.akorn.net (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09
>00:29:32)); Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:50:21 +0000 (EST)
>From [email protected] Fri Feb 02 09:53:19 2001
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Organization: Private
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
>Sender: [email protected]
>Precedence: bulk
>X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
>
>Bill:
>
>The "Carolina Windom" is an Off Center Fed dipole rather than a true Windom
>as both are described in the ARRL Antenna Book. By feeding off center, a
>reasonably low SWR in the range of 2 to 4 can be expected on most
>harmonics of the half wave resonant frequency which in this case is 80
>meters. An antenna tuner is still required on most bands. You may not care
>for the radiation pattern on 40 meters as the main lobes are off the ends
>with a high radiation angle and a null occurs on the sides.
>
>The G5RV will provide a comparable SWR and has an oval radiation pattern on
>40 meters with the broadside being about 6 db stronger than off the ends.
>The G5RV is also slightly shorter at 102' compared to 130' if that is a
>consideration. Be aware that the ARRL Antenna Book (18th Edition)
>incorrectly describes the G5RV matching transmission line as 75 ohms rather
>than 300 to 450 ohms. Having tried both antennas, the G5RV is my personal
>preference.
>
>- Thor Hallen K5AGE
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Marchand [SMTP:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:20 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [TowerTalk] Multiband wire antennas
>
>Does anyone have any experience with a multiband antenna known as the
>"Carolina Windom"? Trying to decide between basic dipole, G5RV, or the
>Windom as the next antenna here.
>Thanks,
>Bill WA1DXA
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>Submissions: [email protected]
>Administrative requests: [email protected]
>Problems: [email protected]
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>Submissions: [email protected]
>Administrative requests: [email protected]
>Problems: [email protected]
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: [email protected]
Administrative requests: [email protected]
Problems: [email protected]
|