Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] guying distance

To: Courtney Judd <k4wi@k4wi.net>, "Towertalk@contesting.com" <Towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] guying distance
From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:56:11 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
An AM radio tower only has to support the tower and its wind load.

I think marketing comes into play for the 80%. ie what practical length guy base, #, and placement maximizes the tower antenna sq ft load rating. If I were Tim Rohn that is what I would ask the engineers to specify for the amateur community.

Grant KZ1W

On 12/5/2018 8:30 AM, Courtney Judd wrote:

There is a commercial tower not far from me that has been up for many years.... an old AM unit now with some cell antennas on it. I marvel at it ever time I drive by wondering how it has stayed up this long. It is 150 ft tall with the guy wire  ground spots at 50 ft from the tower.... defies all logic but somebody way back when thought it was a good idea and so far so good! lol 73's Cort K4WI


Grant Saviers <mailto:grants2@pacbell.net>
Wednesday, December 05, 2018 10:17 AM
Except that a PE can change this with the proper analysis.  Also, a post plus deadman end is a way to geometrically shorten the 80%.  Look at commercial guyed towers and they often have a shorter guy anchor to base perecent (ie steeper guy angles).

Grant KZ1W


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>