CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend
From: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:41:54 EST
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 1/23/2007 8:23:41 P.M. Central Standard Time, Jimk8mr  
writes:

Amen!  
 
Perhaps contest sponsors should deduct points for busted qsos based  on the 
signal report passed out.  If the guy was really Readability 5,  and you blew 
it, you must be pretty dumb, so deduct 5 qsos. But if he is only  Readability 
1, and you mess it up, it was for understandable reasons, so don't  beat the 
guy so hard     :>)
 
73  -  Jim   K8MR
 



 
The point I am trying to make is, some want to be accurate when you send  
your year licensed,  so, why not be accurate and send a true signal  
report...you 
can make up a phoney 59, but, it's not OK to switch up your name or  year 
licensed??  Hmmm...double standard..
 
73-Chuck KI9A
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>