CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections

To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections
From: "Bill Brooks" <bill.ke5og@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:48:35 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Tom,

I love it..."don't pee before your water comes". With your permission I can
think of a lot of uses for that statement.

Sometimes the SO2R guys (me included) drag but I don't imagine it
ever taking 15 or 20 seconds.

Like someone said, it may have been non-contesters. I noticed I had to
send the exchange a second time a lot. Again I think it was folks who didn't
quite know what to expect. Glad they were there though.

Bill

On Jan 7, 2008 1:34 PM, Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> wrote:

> > What's with all the CR/LF stuff? I need to see your
> > section before you scroll it off my screen.
> > What's with the LDC's (long delayed responses)? Some guys
> > wait 15 or 20 seconds before answering your CQ. Why?
>
> I think what computer programmers need to do is have a
> "signal lost" indicator on the screen. RTTY is not like
> normal modes (sorry, the Devil made me say that) in that the
> operator often cannot hear the signal drop. The receiving op
> watches the screen and then has to figure out what is
> garbage from noise and what is something being sent.
>
> He also might be typing.
>
> My daddy always used to say "don't pee before your water
> comes boy".  I think that applies to repeat transmissions
> and not waiting long enough for replies. That's true on CW,
> but especially true on a mode that you can't easily hear or
> see the transmitting signal drop.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>