I second the thanks and kudos for K1TTT's good work in this area.
Jim George N3BB
At 07:33 AM 12/6/2008 -0600, Robert Naumann wrote:
>Hmmm....
>
>So then, this hobby is not supposed to be "self-policing" as I have been led
>to believe for the last 35+ years? Since when is peer pressure wrong in this
>arena?
>
>Executioner? Please - spare me the drama. He has no power over anyone nor
>can what he reports cause anyone to lose points, or to be DQed.
>
>Dave's work is more like an "investigative report" by a highly qualified
>correspondent.
>
>K1TTT is doing amateur radio contesting a service and deserves our thanks -
>not such misplaced critique. Save the criticism for the cheaters.
>
>Thanks K1TTT! Keep up the good work!
>
>73,
>
>Bob W5OV
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K0HB
>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:10 PM
>To: k1ttt@arrl.net; 'CQ-Contest'
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report
>
>
>K1TTT writes:
>
> > And that has happened, and logs have been withdrawn.....
>
>Well there you have it then.
>
>Your good work can and does catch cheaters, and when presented to the
>contest sponsors, does get logs withdrawn. Good job. The contesting
>community is in your debt.
>
>But anything beyond that is essentially a public hanging not conducted by
>the contest sponsor, but independently carried our by a self appointed
>prosecutor, judge, and executioner.
>
>73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|