CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22

To: Gerry Hull <gerry@w1ve.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22
From: "Chris (DL8MBS)" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:11:38 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Gerry Hull wrote:

>I believe there are very legitimate "real-radio" reasons for remote receivers 
>
Maybe you should quote a few here going beyond logging 240 Zones during 
CQWW (with your call on the Xtreme-reflector for sharing receivers in a 
worldwide community it should be possible - perhaps even with only 5 
watts on both sides). Or is it already a "real-radio" reason to log 
DX-stations on 160m with qrp on both sides during daylight hours 
(possible with reasonable located remote receivers)?
73, Chris

(www.dl8mbs.de)


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>