CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges

To: <KI9A@aol.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges
From: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:49:03 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Rhetorical question:  if you're not planning on submitting a log for the 
contest, and are not in the contest, are you bound by the contest rules?

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <KI9A@aol.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges


>
> Paul, needing reviewed or not, THEY BROKE the rules by not sending their
> call as part of the exchange!!! I certainly does not make it right to do
> this,  just because you think the rules need changed...
>
> Not sure how many ARRL SS's you have participated in, but why are you so
> concerned about this subject? Has it been a thorn in your side?  I'm
> actually a bit confused at how this rule is not "outdated". Hmmm.
>
> I looked at my notes, I had 14 out of almost 700 stations do this.  I
> asked for a fill from each of them, in order to make the QSO legit.
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 11/10/2010 5:42:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> pokane@ei5di.com writes:
>
> Why  should they be DQed?  Some rules, like laws,
> become outdated and may  need to be  reviewed.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>