CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (yet again)

To: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (yet again)
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 18:08:36 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In my opinion you are merely using a propagation tool, not collecting 
callsigns/QRG's.  You have received no information which identifies target 
stations to work.

I would not consider it "assistance".

73, de Hans, K0HB

-----Original Message----- 
From: Igor Sokolov
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:14 PM
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (yet again)

With great number of skimmers used by RBN I have developed a habit of
checking propagation on different bands by calling CQ on a clear spot and
collecting skimmers data.  VE7CC cluster software allows setting filters so
that you only see spots for your own call sign.
Now I wonder would such a technique be a violation of not assisted
category. In essence I would not get no outside help in locating,
identifying and working stations in the contest. I just get accurate and up
to date information about propagation which is basically more accurate then
what I might have got with the help of propagation prediction software.
What is contesting public opinion?

73, Igor UA9CDC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>