CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:09:16 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Do that in WWDX if you like, I don´t:

"Call sign errors (bust) or call signs not in the other log (NIL) are
removed and receive a penalty of two times the QSO point value for that
contact."

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Igor Sokolov
Sent: Freitag, 19. Dezember 2014 06:19
To: Peter Voelpel; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP

In such a case I only send my call and work and log both in one go.

73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP


>I do that all the time if a couple of state site stations share or fight a
> frequency.
> That happens more often you might think especially on 10m.
> 
> 73
> Peter
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Steve Lott
> 
> how about those that say............
> 
> please copy or even worse 
> 
> 
> start by calling a station that was cqing by
> sending the cqing stations call
> 
> hell if I was calling cq I know my own dam call !
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>