CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics
From: "OZ1BII Henning" <mail@oz1bii.dk>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:40:03 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Only complaint: if you're from Europe and you want QTCs, and you come 
> by my frequency, dont send just  QTC? without a call. It makes no 
> sense -- I MAY have QTCs for you -- but I don't know if I don't have 
> your call, and therefore have to ask you for it.  <Callsign> QTC? 
> would be a much better way of asking.

I totally agree. --------------- [Katsuhiro 'Don' Kondou, JH5GHM (JH1GBZ for
contesting)]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
I DISAGREE - It is much faster to just send QTC?  And get an answer YES or
NO. If Yes then send Callsign. 
WHY - The caller knows if he has got some QTC's from you. Else he wouln't
ask for it 
Best 73 de OZ1BII Henning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------


CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>