CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:45:04 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat,12/17/2016 7:47 AM, Tom Hellem wrote:
If a separate SOA category was created for NAQP, how would that
detract from the enjoyment of operating the contest  for those
who choose to run under the SO category?

Packet spots generates runs that make it tough for stations with weaker signals to get through. This makes it more exciting for the running station, but quite frustrating for the weaker stations. When I'm running, it's easy to tell when I've been spotted -- it gets busy for a while, then slows down.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>