That was the April 2015 issue, maybe that was the ARRLs "April Fools"
article for that year!
73 John AF5CC
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:
> Earlier in this thread, W4AAW claimed that "We have 31 team members
> who operate W4AAW's positions from all over NA, from Panama, Europe
> and Asia, provided they meet legal/licensing requirements".
>
> I'm not so sure. Here is what is required of remote operators as
> stated on Page 9 of QST for April 2015.
>
> "For operation across international borders,
> both the operator and the station must be licensed by the
> administration where the transmitter is located. CEPT
> Recommendation T/R 61-01 does not apply: if, for example, a
> European amateur wants to operate a remote station that’s
> located in the United States, he or she must have an FCC
> license."
>
> That's clear and unambiguous. All team-W4AAW members operating
> from non-US countries must have a US licence for the operation
> as a whole to meet legal/licensing requirements.
>
> Some recent contest entries by team-W4AAW did NOT comply with
> this requirement - at least one team-W4AAW overseas operator
> did not have an FCC licence at those times.
>
> If team-W4AAW knew this, they were flouting the law. If they
> did not know it, they should have known. Either way, the
> entries concerned were unlicensed.
>
> Have we got to the stage in contesting where this no
> longer matters?
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|