TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] wither CW?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] wither CW?
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:03:15 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Interesting, and apparently very good news for CWs.

Not to rain on your parade, but I am not sure the data supports the stated conclusion ... While it suggests there are more CW operators out there, it is far from conclusive. This data only proves participation in CW contests has increased, as measured by the number of logs submitted, and by the increasing number of contacts.

Thus, the total number of CW operators could have diminished, with more of those remaining participating each year in the contest. Moreover, a greater number of contacts each year could be attributed to other factors, such as the use of CW skimmer and other software applications, and other tools, such as memory keyers and techniques decreasing the time it takes to complete a contact.

But ... it IS a good indication. I am one of three guys from our Friday lunch bunch (or maybe 20-23 guys total) who are learning code right now. Hopefully we exemplify the newer ham licensee who wants to learn code for the fun of it, not because we have to.

Maybe the number of CW operators HAS been increasing, on the theory that kids don't take to the piano if you force them to take piano lessons, but will take up the instrument for life if they start voluntarily.

Parenthetically, I suspect the reason more operators do CW then SSB in dual type contests, is because a CW contact generally counts for more points than and SSB contacts. It is that way, for example, in the Michigan QSO Party, which counts two points for a CW contacts, and one point for an SSB contact. I don't want to participate in the contest as a rookie or first-year contestant, until I know the code, because unless one does CW, he has no chance of winning.

==========================  K8JHR  ================================



On 5/24/2010 1:47 AM, Jim Brown K9YC wrote:
Anyone who thinks CW is dying ought to turn on their radio during
a contest. Some easily available statistics:

Contest         Logs   QSOs by Leader
ARRL SS CW 09   1553    1597
ARRL SS CW 08   1420    1529
ARRL 160M 09    1366    2046
ARRL 160M 08    1280    1753
ARRL DX CW 09   3131    5928
ARRL DX CW 08   2686    4797

Note that these numbers all show increased participation year to
year. In ARRL SS and ARRL 160M, you can work a station only once,
so that means at least 1597 stations were on the air in SS09, and
2046 in ARRL 160 09 (and thats a single band contest that many
hams cant work at all)! In ARRL DX, you can work each station on
multiple bands.

In most contests that run both CW and SSB simultaneously, theres
more activity on CW than SSB.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>