Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@kk9a.com: 451 ]

Total 451 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP RTTY - SO2R Reply Delays (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:00:19 -0500
I have never operated NAQP but in other RTTY contests sometimes it is hard to keep the timing between radios perfect. Some people give long exchanges and others give more efficient reports. What happ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-02/msg00071.html (8,329 bytes)

282. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] ARRL DX SSB Recordings (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 20:22:24 -0500
You're in New Jersey and you notice this! Hopefully the sunspots will someday return. 73, John KK9A Certainly is interesting. Even though W2RE was not as loud as others at the time you made the recor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00022.html (6,639 bytes)

283. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:58:45 -0400
Stan must have used Super Check Partial to obtain the WN4 prefix:) John KK9A Most all other contests. If you call ZF9CW and I log you as WN4AFO, you get credit and I don't. If I log you as Zone 4 wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00060.html (8,823 bytes)

284. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:25:22 -0400
This is an interesting post since I just made a RG400 jumper last night. It was made with coax also purchased on eBay more than a year ago however mine is clearly marked with the manufacture's name -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00089.html (9,140 bytes)

285. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] N1MM+ hacked? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:28:08 -0500
You will lose your log files eventually if you do not back up your computer. I back my log up many times even during the contest. There are many ways to do this, 1 terabyte external USB drives that w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-04/msg00080.html (6,674 bytes)

286. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 22:51:33 -0500
I agree, please keep FT? contests separate from RTTY. Unlike FT?, RTTY decoders are not perfect. To do well a RTTY operator needs to quickly look at multiple decoders to determine what the callsign a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00010.html (8,081 bytes)

287. Re: [CQ-Contest] Minority Report: FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 17:29:43 -0500
You need to show the FCC's definition of "communication" before you can make that statement. John KK9A An interesting thought. FT# modes produce QSOs that comply with FCC Rule 97.119 a. while typical
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00038.html (9,281 bytes)

288. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 08:29:07 -0500
It CQ WW, which is the #1 major contest, CW decoders are allowed in the categories that allow QSO finding assistance. John KK9A CW decoders are strictly prohibited in the majors. Barry W2UP _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00050.html (8,471 bytes)

289. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where did "Reflector" come from? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:15:17 -0500
Contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ calls all of them "Mailing Lists". John KK9A Looking back, do any of you greybeards out there remember where the name "reflector" came from? I much prefer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00103.html (8,730 bytes)

290. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M FT4 Frequency (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:42:21 -0500
What does 7.040 RTTY/Data DX mean? Is this a single channel? FWIW I have made a number of DX RTTY QSOs slightly above 7.040, perhaps even on the new 7.0475 FT4 frequency. That segment of 40m is quite
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00029.html (9,193 bytes)

291. [CQ-Contest] FTx (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:32:24 -0500
This month there have 81 posts on cq-contest and 65 of them were about the newer digi FT4 and FT8 modes. I have noticed the same trend on other lists too. The top band group claims that there is now
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00087.html (6,815 bytes)

292. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] Impressive demonstration of one dB of signal strength improvement (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:55:01 -0500
What a great presentation and how it relates to contest scores. It starts to get very expensive when you are squeezing that last dB out of your station either though commercial sized Heliax or by add
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00145.html (8,787 bytes)

293. Re: [CQ-Contest] Impressive demonstration of one dB of signal strength improvement (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:35:52 -0500
Isn't that the truth! Of course unnecessary information such as /qrp is always perfect copy. John KK9A Regardless of speed, it always seems the fade/QRN is synchronized with the callsign and you miss
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00152.html (8,544 bytes)

294. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST donovanf at starpower.net donovanf at starpower.net Mon Aug 26 14:23:14 EDT 2019 Previous message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Next message (by th (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:36:35 -0500
I agree, articles to attract new contesters would be great. Also it is nice to show more than top ten scores, many little pistol ops would love to see their callsign in the magazine. CQ Magazine stil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00190.html (9,544 bytes)

295. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Thoughts and Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:09:45 -0500
Did the RTTY subbands change? I have made thousands of contest RTTY QSOs in many of these FTx segments. John KK9A - W4AAA Rules and FAQ: https://ww-digi.com/index.htm One issue is contest mode versus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00238.html (8,778 bytes)

296. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:03 -0500
I have never operated FT8 or FT4 but I have enjoyed reading about the recent contest. It appears that there are some things that the FTx operator has no control over such as saying this was a good QS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-09/msg00022.html (8,973 bytes)

297. Re: [CQ-Contest] VY1AAA (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:29:30 -0500
This is great news for Sweepstakes lovers. You do a fantastic job operating VY1AAA [nice suffix:)], I never had trouble finding and working you however getting a sweep in the CW leg is still quite a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-10/msg00015.html (8,657 bytes)

298. [CQ-Contest] Multiple antennas on a ring rotator (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:47:20 -0500
I posted the message shown below on towertalk and received no response. Since contesters are creative and resourceful I thought I would also try posting it here. I am wondering if anyone has experien
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-10/msg00016.html (7,118 bytes)

299. [CQ-Contest] Precedence? (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:27:01 -0600
What it the best way to ask for a repeat of someone's precedence in SS CW? For me this is the most difficult part of the exchange to get sent again. Often I get the section is repeated instead and I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00049.html (6,681 bytes)

300. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW Raw Scores Available (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:12:57 -0600
Some of these CQWW CW scores are just amazing, especially in the single op AB categories. I have been on the DX side of pileups and it can be exhausting, to do this for 48 hours straight is quite a f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00096.html (8,248 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu