Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Posting\s+Scores\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] posting scores (score: 1)
Author: Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:27:41 -0500
Hi All...once again the NQ4I M-M team will be posting our scores on the www.cqcontest.ru site for all to see...I challenge ALL users of packet/skimmer etc to post your scores..if you are using the in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00178.html (6,961 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] posting scores (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:01:07 -0500
For those using N1MM Logger+ this year, I will shortly be posting at <http://n1mm.hamdocs.com/tiki-index.php?page=Realtime+Score+Reporting> an interim procedure for setting up to post scores. Why "'i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00180.html (8,682 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] posting scores (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:34:05 -0500
I will be posting my score also. It was great fun in WW SSB chasing AA3B through the weekend. Provides some nice motivation to see the guy you are chasing or to stay ahead of those with scores around
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00185.html (8,661 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] posting scores (score: 1)
Author: Luc DXBrasil <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:47:33 -0300
Folks, I see no good argument to not post score online during contest. I'm talking to every one, but mostly to big guns and serious SO effort. Score posting is automatic, extreme low bandwidth consum
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00188.html (8,386 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:14:24 -0400
I cannot believe what I have been seeing and hearing this RDXC!! Hundreds of stateside signals and not hardly a one posting a score...I feel very strongly that if you USE the technology to have packe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00098.html (6,996 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:21:44 -0400
It's great that the capabilities to which Rick refers exist and are used by those who wish. It's not so great to attempt to bully others to "do it only my way". The RUDX already is uninteresting to a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00099.html (8,688 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:54:05 -0400
As of my latest count, there were over 40 "reports" for the Russian DX contest from North Ameroican stations. Probably not 100%, but not shabby. Remember, reporting in the 3830 reflector is optional.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00100.html (8,273 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Rick Dougherty <rick@nq4i.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:41:41 -0400
Hi Pete...very valid points...I have been an ardent supporter and user for a number of years...over the years most comments that I hear is 1. my operating strategy is mine and mine alone, and I would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00101.html (11,363 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:40:35 -0400
Since when is posting scores mandatory? W3WN I cannot believe what I have been seeing and hearing this RDXC!! Hundreds of stateside signals and not hardly a one posting a score...I feel very strongly
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00102.html (8,794 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Rick Dougherty <rick@nq4i.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:07:20 -0700
Re-read my post. Not mandatory. But i think it is a matter that if you use one then you should give back. Don't you? Rick Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00103.html (9,563 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:14:52 -0400
The implication of your post is that it is or should be mandatory to post scores. I respectfully disagree with you on this point. But since you feel that someone who chooses to use the Cluster during
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00104.html (11,015 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:15:21 -0400
I'm really surprised at the response to this. I don't think that's what Rick meant by his post. In my note to rick, part of which he quoted, I offered a few reasons why I thought the cqcontest.net si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00105.html (10,742 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:29:50 -0300
I think Rick means posting ongoing live scoreboards, not post-test 3830 results scores, right Rick? Let's be clear. Of 3830, I have this to say: I love it ! I can air my beefs, tribulations, trials a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00106.html (9,298 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:58:03 -0600
I also would say that It would be nice to support what our friends are doing in other areas so they continue to support our contests like ARRL DX. In regards to scoreboard watching. You can't believe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00107.html (11,250 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Kinzli N6GQ <jeff@n6gq.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:50:14 -0700
To me, contesting is very much a social event as well as an independent race. In my mind, you get the best of both worlds, and you get to choose which one (or both, or neither) you focus on. For me,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00108.html (14,145 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:08:44 -0400
A local contester once walked me through setting up my logger so my scores would get automatically posted to a real-time scoreboard -"cqcontest.ru" I think it was. I think this was 2013 WAE CW. cqcon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00109.html (8,708 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:55:54 -0400
When I started this idea about 8 years ago, we had pretty good participation. As Pete said, as time went on, I did not have the bandwidth to continue managing and updating the site. K1TTT took over f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00110.html (11,268 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:25:40 -0400
I am happy to hear that many people get more enjoyment out of contesting by following along with competitors on "real time scoreboard". I am also happy to hear that many like the use and efficiency b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00111.html (9,134 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:58:37 -0600
Tim, Not sure if you actually read some of the previous postings - especially the one that said cqcontest.ru is now cqcontest.net . Dmitry, the owner of cqcontest.net, has recently complicated the pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00112.html (10,331 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:07:05 -0400
For the AC3U (@K4VV) WPX SSB effort, we are going to try turning on the cqcontest.net reporting from N1MM Classic, which the station is still on. Mainly just to play with something new, partly to see
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00113.html (9,219 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu