Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Clipperton\-L\s+parasitic\s+suppressors\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:33:58 -0500
I have cleverly filed my Clipperton-L doc. I am hoping someone can help. The parasitic suppressor resistors have broken. I believe they are 100 ohm 2W composition. Can anyone confirm the value? I am
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00181.html (6,689 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:57:27 +0800
G'day Larry, At the risk of offending the masses, don't worry what value they are. Just go to http://www.somis.org and scroll down to <http://www.somis.org/Price-Info.html>Price List--Information She
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00182.html (8,616 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Tim Long <tlong8@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:29:54 -0500
Hi Larry, Yes, indeed they are 100 ohm, 2W, carbon composition. Carbon composition resistors are hard to find. Ceramic composition resistors are a good substitute. I just ordered some myself from Mou
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00183.html (8,181 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:57:18 -0500
No offense Alek but the masses on here dont believe in voodo science as they do on the forum you just arrived from. You might want to search the archives on the subject. Larry, for a real suppressor
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00185.html (10,682 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:05:18 -0500
That is supposed to be original coil (or clone) Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00186.html (11,855 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:32 -0500
I am reminded of an exchange between Neils Bohr and a friend. The friend had just discovered a horseshoe nailed above Bohr's door and asked why it was there. "It's supposed to bring good luck", said
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00187.html (12,280 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:38:04 -0500
The existing units are about 0.25 inches (maybe 0.3125) on center from the tube envelope. I am not sure how hot the tube envelope gets offhand but it can't be that good for the resistor. I bought the
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00188.html (12,090 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:43:47 +0800
Ha ha. No offense taken Carl. You won't offend me in a hurry. Number 1, I'm married. Number 2, I live by the principle that if you strike a match, then don't cry to mummy (you say mommy) that the fir
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00189.html (12,778 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:48:39 -0500
I may have tried it WARC bands at some point but that would have been long ago. I do not currently have any WARC band antennas. My Clipperton-L also has an added tuned input board which does not incl
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00190.html (10,044 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:58:40 +0800
No, I can't. My experience is limited to about 10 Yaesu amps, 3 x SB-220, and a couple of home brew models (3-500Z and 4-1000A). Agreed. I've worked on 3 AL-811 amps and that is one area that did no
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00191.html (14,136 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:52:38 -0500
Lots of things work Alek, there are enough poorly designed amps on the market that prove that. I prefer to attack the problem; and not the symptom and lose a few hundred watts on 10M to heat. It also
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00192.html (14,211 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:13:10 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
"Measures was banned from this reflector for his stand and obvious completely wrong theories." While I constantly disagreed with Rich, he was not banned for his wrong ideas. He was banned because of
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00193.html (9,129 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:47:01 -0500
Negatives are often difficult to prove, however the question should be, "can any one prove they add anything in the way of protection over the standard arrangement"? 73 Roger (K8RI) _________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00194.html (14,059 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:49:34 -0500
It's been a long time since I worked on the Cliperton Ls but as I recall you just remove the tubes and the bottom ones should be easy to get at. The most common problem I worked on was a shorted coax
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00195.html (13,500 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:22:57 +0000
Sorry, Carl, that isn't correct: Measures was not banned for his theories (wrong and tiresome though they were). He was actually banned for bad *behavior*, which was tolerated far longer on AMPS than
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00196.html (9,434 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Dave White <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:39:50 +0100
I never cease to me impressed by the powers of Mr Measures. The late Bill Shankly (one of the greatest soccer managers of his generation - for the benefit of the uneducated) described one of his play
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00198.html (9,374 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:50:00 -0500
I realize that Ian but wasnt in the mood to raise those wounds again. I felt the participants would understand that and leave it alone. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00199.html (10,359 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:05:17 -0500
Humans continue to be easy marks for sweet deals from a flim flam person to borrow an old phrase. PT Barnum (or whoever you believe was the originator) got it right in the 1800's........ "There's a s
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00201.html (11,124 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:46:01 -0500
Carl, There is a big difference between pushing snake oil and being abusive to those who point out that the device is snake oil. When top notch engineers and designers were being harassed and driven
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00202.html (11,874 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:21:32 +0000
I don't want to re-start that war either, but there is now a new generation of participants who weren't there at the time. There is a big and *important* difference between banning someone for his te
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00206.html (10,115 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu