Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRM\s+in\s+DX\s+Window\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:49:38 -0000
It is now 0930Z and there are 3 stations in the 75 meter DX window calling CQ SS. I tuned up & down the 75 meter band several times and there is more than 100khz of space above 3800 not being used. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00580.html (7,767 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:06:36 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The underlying problem is that certain groups of hams think they "own" certain frequencies or windows, just like with the SSTV group on 20 or the CW ops on 160.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00583.html (8,112 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:59:17 -0800 (PST)
I don't often agree with Mal, N7MAL but this time I do. I tuned the 75m DX window Saturday night and found a few stations calling CQ (and spotted them on packet). I did not tune around the band to fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00607.html (7,734 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optonline.net
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:32:59 +0000 (GMT)
Mal: Personally, I would stay out of the window, but being QRP, it probably wouldn't matter either way. To answer your question, you should probably direct your concern(s) to the sponsor (ARRL, in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00608.html (8,232 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:02:55 -0500
This discussion kinda reminds me of the old Roger Miller country song, "You Can't Rollerskate in a Buffalo Herd", which seems to be a somewhat appropriate analogy to this situation. Should get really
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00615.html (8,932 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:23:11 -0000
On Sunday evening, I was lucky enough to find a clear frequency on 75m around 3797. I knew it was in the DX zone, but running low power, any port in a storm. I called CQ and ran a dozen stations or s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00617.html (10,462 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:25:43 -0000
Lately many replies to my comments have started out with: ""I don't often agree with Mal, N7MAL but this time I do."" It's a scary world if I'm making sense...hihihi.... There were many rude stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00618.html (10,544 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gilmer <n2mg@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:37:14 -0800 (PST)
I'm not a big fan of special windows during contests. During "normal" times, it makes sense to have certain operating areas in which one can increase the odds of finding like-minded individuals (Digi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00625.html (11,235 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:24:59 -0600
Without prejudice to no one, I offer the following thoughts on band plans from the very ARRL whose rules Mal is basing his argument upon: You'll note that it comes down very clearly in favour of 'rea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00626.html (14,419 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:05:01 -0600
I think during contests, ALL rules and gentleman's agreements should be suspended- no power limits, no subbands, no frequency allocations. All of these are an impediment to my making contacts, and re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00628.html (10,663 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:53:30 -0500
Not being a 75m DXer, Saturday evening I also unknowingly landed in the "window". I was promptly (and politely) asked to QSY by one of the "window police". Wanting SS QSO's more than an argument, I m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00633.html (12,387 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:54:08 -0500
W7MAL asks: Why is it that certain licensees think they should have a "right" to any frequency or set of frequencies free of QRM 24 x 7 x 365 whether they are using them at the time or not? Why is it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00634.html (10,395 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:46:39 -0500
Why even bother having a DX window on SSB? During a major contest 75 meters is so crowded that it's hard to hear anyone at all on your own frequency. During CQWW SSB I heard many DX stations (many in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00635.html (8,930 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:29:11 +0000
Kelly, you may be technically correct and "win" that battle here on this (contest-oriented) reflector, but everyone blindly following that advice will help contesters lose the more important war of p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00645.html (10,087 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 9:58:54 -0500
The purpose of having DX windows etc... was so people with common interests could find each other. These windows have served their purpose and IMO are no longer needed. Just about anyone with a compu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00651.html (9,489 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:49:08 -0600
contesters for everything. Name me some other activity that gives you a chance to work DXCC or WAS in one weekend or put a dent in your effort to work all the US counties. Sure there is the QRM to d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00665.html (8,923 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:11:30 -0000
Bud that was a reply right on the money. Thank you. I have received several emails criticizing me and asking me to define the holes in the band I've been referring to for SS & CQWWSSB. I am a contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00672.html (11,479 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:56:46 -0600 (CST)
A 2 kHz hole would be a HUGE hole for CW and still a big hole for SSB. I've tried to fit into such holes many times myself. It seems I had such a puny signal in SSB SS that I didn't bother anyone. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00680.html (10,601 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Chet Moore" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:56:42 -0500
Hi Bud, . nickel cokes, the 5 cent newspaper and a 10 cent cup of coffee are things of the past. In 30 days, the DX window problem should resolve itself Those filters are working. If it weren't for t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00685.html (11,565 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:34:42 -0500
Kelly, VE4XT posed a significant question, "...if it weren't for contests, would there be enough activity to justify the continuance of ham radio?..." -or at least- justify retention of our current f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00693.html (9,626 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu