Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Zero\s+Beating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Zero\s+Beating\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:58:27 -0600; I noticed in the WPX CW test that a fair number of stations were way off my xmit frequency. This is the first time I recall making a mental note of this occurring in a contest. I had my skirts set at; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00403.html (7,116 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:38:30 +0000; ...... Several times, yes, I had them calling as much as 700 kHz off. But only a cupla times. Ya think they're gwan start doing that in voice contests??? ==8-O Steve, K0XP ___________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00001.html (8,044 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:14:41 +0000; Same thing for me. I use a 250 Hz filter and sometimes I need to switch on the 500 Hz one to listen the station calling me, listening by the way the adjacent running station. The funniest is went a s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00003.html (9,337 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 04:14:04 -0000; Mike I find myself , especially on strong signals to call the first time off by 500hz or more because when I'm tuning across the band I have the rx open to 2.8 khz. I try to be carefull to get on fre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00004.html (9,225 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:48:42 -0400; I noticed that as well. Not surprisingly, I noticed that it coincided with spots that were off. If someone spotted us 200Hz off, it was a safe bet that many of the next callers would be 200Hz off. Th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00005.html (9,508 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Per Eklund" <per.e@kommunicera.umea.se>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:59:17 +0200; Yes, I have also noticed this. I beleive that some people prefer to listen with a higher or lower pich than the "right one". But they forget to adjust the rit (xit)to their preferring listening tone.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00008.html (9,152 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:30:20 -0400; Yes it's a problem, normally in S&P i use a 250Hz filter but it is almost impossible in RUN, had to use 800 in the last WPX. Same thing happen on RTTY and I have a macro telling: sri you are off off; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00010.html (8,876 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:41:36 -0000; Yes, I noticed this as well. I had a couple guys call me over 200Hz off my freq and it was a miracle I got them at all. I was using the RIT to sweep the area looking for anyone not right on my freq b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00011.html (9,646 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 05:58:24 -0600; I noticed this too, in folks calling in singles and in groups, from across the spectrum of geography and bands. I couldn't get a handle on why. It wasn't the "group" avoidance in many cases. Sloppy h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00012.html (8,893 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Richard L. King" <k5na@ecpi.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:37:27 +0000; I noticed that about 80% (maybe even more) of my callers called me 50 to 250 cycles higher than my signal. It got to the point, that during a CQ, I would always set my RIT to 100 cycles above my call; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00014.html (9,659 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:52:03 +0000; Not sure; but it seemed to me that way more folks were calling way off freq during the WPX that I'd ever noticed before, even as recently as contests like the NE QSO Party, or even the ARRL DX CW. It; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00018.html (10,158 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: zl1aih@ihug.co.nz; Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:46:52 +1200; off my xmit frequency. This is the first time I recall making a mental note of this occurring in a contest. I had my skirts set at 300 and then 500. Some were off enough that I thought it was adjacen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00021.html (8,798 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@hughes.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:23:21 -0400; I think many of the problems with zero beating can be explained by packet/internet spots. If you're on 7030.5 and someone spots you on 7030 or 7031, then 7030 or 7031 is where a lot of people will st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00023.html (9,640 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero beating (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:47:02 -0400; VO1HE said "I also noticed that most Europeans that called were higher in freq while most NA stations were lower. Not sure what that indicates." Coriolus force? Sorry. 73, Art K3KU __________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00024.html (8,142 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: mike dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:33:21 -0700; and then there are those of us who operate some contests xtal control (SS, FD) i am pretty good zero beating on 160 but by the time i get up to 20 the ole ARC5 knob can be a little tweaky............; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00025.html (7,902 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero beating (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:46:49 -0000; That's some good, circular thinking, Art. 73 -- Paul VO1HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00027.html (9,408 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero beating (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:32:02 -0000; The answer is EASY the NA stations are all on the Left Hand side. Quack _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00030.html (9,381 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Tim Goeppinger" <timgep@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:10:55 +0000; VO1HE said "I also noticed that most Europeans that called were higher in freq while most NA stations were lower. Not sure what that indicates." Perhaps the fashion trend this year in Paris calls for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00032.html (8,683 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "VE3MGY" <vy2mgy@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:31:29 -0400; I always find the same thing here as well Mike. And the narrower the filters I am using at the time the more stations that I can notice are off my TX frequency. Why they are not zero beated I don't k; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00033.html (9,511 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero beating (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:34:32 -0600; Actually, it was the effect of the Blue Moon that was to be... And... that is exactly why I try to stay on whole number freq. and use wide filters... so I can increase my Q count, in spite of all the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00041.html (8,647 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]