Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+RE\:\s+Ping\s+Jitter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+RE\:\s+Ping\s+Jitter\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Timothy J Steele MCSE" <tsteele@e-isco.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:45:31 -0700; We have the same exact problem on ALL our mountain sites. We currently have five mountain sites with 40+ subscribers each. All are running Karl Net flash ROM units with at least 1 GHz CPUs and 256mb; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00044.html (9,841 bytes)
2. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:59:31 -0500; I have seen the same. So...I'm totally screwed. I'm not going to change out 30 subs antenna or overamp the sector to get the "greater than 15db" SNR. Turn off polling and what's the big advantage to; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00045.html (11,332 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:15:53 -0700; No, it's time to start looking at Proxim's WORP, or some other vendor entirely. I'm considering adding WORP to the mix, starting with our backhaul. Proxim's MP.11a product is getting a close look. I; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00046.html (13,769 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Thomas Giger TGC <thomas.giger@tgc.de>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:21:53 +0200; Turn off polling and you may be screwed even more by self interference from hidden nodes talking into the AP. We've tried that and it doesn't work. No, polling is what you need. But if you want to b; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00047.html (10,349 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Travis Lists <travis-lists@netwaveinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:23:11 -0400; I have had the same issue for a year now. Finally narrowed it down to a handful of customers with bad SNRs (<15 or so), and moved them to a different system. Still, I see the ugly ping monster rear i; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00048.html (12,599 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:22:13 -0500; All, I need to follow the lists more closely! Version 4.44 has a fix that we believe will solve "ping jitter". To OVER SIMPLIFY the issue- the satellites are suppose to try to send a packet when they; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00049.html (13,214 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:07:34 -0700; Travis, what's the pricing on Canopy? Norm; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00050.html (14,304 bytes)
8. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:18:06 -0400; Hello, I find it curious that people use ICMP rtt to measure anything. This is even flawed in tradition land-based networking for various reasons, however compound the fact that the Karlnet polling a; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00051.html (9,860 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Rick Harnish" <wireless@onlyinternet.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:25:36 -0500; As a beta tester, I can report a great improvement in "ping jitter" with 4.44. I have been testing for about a week in five markets of varying size. Only issues I have had are very minor and have bee; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00052.html (14,179 bytes)
10. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Travis Lists" <travis-lists@netwaveinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:37:11 -0400; CPE costs rival Orinoco or Karlnet gear, all told. Talk to Charles. :-) Travis Travis, what's the pricing on Canopy? Norm -- Original Message -- From: "Travis Lists" <travis-lists@netwaveinternet.com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00053.html (15,362 bytes)
11. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Paul Horak <paulhorak@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:27:45 -0700 (PDT); Hi Kevin, Dare I ask if there will be any way to upgrade the low cost CPE's with this version? Last I heard Karlnet were 'working on it'. If not, will the upgrade to the AP be enough to 'fix it' with; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00054.html (9,635 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:12:22 -0500; The problem that I am seeing is not only dropped pings on links with perfect SNR (25?) but complete outages for the CPE for a few minutes, sometimes. This is affecting multiple sites. Time for some s; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00055.html (10,873 bytes)
13. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:25:40 -0400; Also, there seems to be some debate about whether this is a problem or not - can you clarify if Karlnet see this as a problem or just the nature of how polling works? Hello, I won't speak for Karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00056.html (10,784 bytes)
14. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:33:00 -0500; Paul, This does not yet seem to be an issue that will require an upgrade to the low cost CPE devices, since they function more like an NDIS client. The Base should take care of it. I do not think the; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00057.html (9,656 bytes)
15. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:34:13 -0400; Bob Hrbek wrote: The problem that I am seeing is not only dropped pings on links with perfect SNR (25?) but complete outages for the CPE for a few minutes, sometimes. This is affecting multiple sites; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00058.html (10,179 bytes)
16. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:37:07 -0500; Chris, I appreciate your viewpoint, but we have seen examples where ping times grow into SECONDS, and that simply is NOT acceptable. Other than that, I do agree with your point! Kevin ** Kevin R. Knu; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00059.html (11,489 bytes)
17. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:51:17 -0400 (EDT); Hello, Yes, 1000+ms or more (for other reasons than base congestion) can be indicative of other issues. I am still curious; the people at that say that 15dBm SNR or less causes this, are they using 1; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00060.html (9,140 bytes)
18. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Bernie Beckel" <bernie@etech-connect.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:42:29 -0600; I'm seeing the same problem. All of my APs are set to 11mbps and all of my RGs are set to 2 mbps.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00061.html (9,733 bytes)
19. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:51:24 -0500; I set base and remote to 5.5Mb I have this problem terribly.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00062.html (9,752 bytes)
20. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:57:14 -0500; This brings to mind a question I have been meaning to ask for a long time. Will a Turbocell client automatically adjust sensitivity or does it lock at the rate you set. In other words, if you set an; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00063.html (10,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]