Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Alpha 87 (not 87A)

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha 87 (not 87A)
From: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 20:50:58 +1300
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 08/11/17 16:57, Jim Brown wrote:
On 11/7/2017 11:57 AM, Steve Wright wrote:
That is a BELIEF.  It's not SCIENCE.

No, it is measurement with calibrated instrumentation.

It's your argument.  I'm pointing out your fallacy and you're rotating the logic.

If YOU make a POINT, then MAKE THE POINT.  Bring the logic, and the support.

> HOW many?  What percentage?  Quote the ACTUAL numbers, aside from what you BELIEVE.

You certainly seem to want to argue. I don't. If you care, turn on your radio, listen, and count them yourself.

That is a narcissist technique to skew the logic so that I am the one presenting the fake logic, instead of YOU.

Nice try, but no.


S

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>