| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? |
| From: | "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:08:50 +0100 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Introduce locators exchange and scoring on distance with low band weights! However, heavy hamradio land investements in P4 and EA8 would be devalued. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN, VK4TI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Luc PY8AZT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW (2pts analisys), David Kopacz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |