To: | "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Karlnet] Is this interference? |
From: | "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net> |
Reply-to: | Brett Hays <bretth@htonline.net>, Karlnet Mailing List<karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:07:29 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
So, the only point of failure up top is the amp. I assume since you place the equipment at the bottom, you have to use amps, correct? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com> To: "'Brett Hays'" <bretth@htonline.net>; "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:26 PM Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Is this interference? > We are highly against placing APs at the top of towers as rain prevents > us from getting up should something need to be replaced. This may sound > remedial to some, but I have heard of people doing it. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Brett Hays |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Norm Young |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Brett Hays |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Norm Young |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |