all bridged?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan" <blsutton@airnetwifi.net>
To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates
> It stripped the image...
> See text based attempt below - you may have to widen your window to see
> properly
> Bryan wrote:
>
> > Interesting - I was just getting ready to purchase KN-200s to resolve
> > that very same issue, I was using Orinoco AP2000s and having same
> > problem. I will hold hold off pending a resultion to your problem -
> > no sense spending the money for new equipment with same problem.
> >
> > I proved to Proxim that it wasn't a network congestion problem or a
> > problem with the internet speed tests by:
> > 1. Setting up an FTP server internal on my network.
> > 2. Shutting off all customers - this wasn't much of an issue as I was
> > testing network and only had people that were willing to use for free,
> > under the understanding that it could go down at any time.
> > 3. Repeatedly DLing & ULing a 120meg file from server to laptop &
> > back, at vatious points in the network while watching with DU Meter.
> >
> > As for your Ping test - it would seem to me that if you are Rxing ~3.4
> > mbps ROUND TRIP - since thisis half duplex the one way should be 2x
> > that or 6.8mbps...?????
> >
> > Personnally - I don't give rat's @ss about any latency tests or any
> > other built in tests - Those can be manipulated by the writer of the
> > software to show favorable results. The only thing a customer, and
> > therefore myself, cares about is that if they are being sold a service
> > at particular speed, they get it. The only way to prove that is to
> > have an internal network speed test of some sort.
> >
> > Here what they told me would support upto 1mbps thruput to customers
> > at any point in the network (using TC for backhaul on one radio -the
> > other radio to serve customers)
> >
> NOC<>KN200w/SG4400<=>KN200w/SG4400<=>KN200w/SG4400<=>KN200w/SG4200
>
> | |
> KN200w/SG4400
> KN200w/SG4400
> |
> |
> KN200w/SG4400
> Future
> |
> KN200w/SG4200
> Upto 64 backhaul links off any one radio - I was told
>
> >
> > Anyone using a network in similiar config, i.e. 4 wireless backhauls,
> > that can verify this?
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> >
> > jna wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Group,
> >>
> >> I am trying to diagnose bad transfer rates in my network and started at
> >> square 1. We have an RG1000 SAT shooting a 3MB/S feed to a central
relay
> >> tower only about 1 mile from the datacenter (-47db Signal). The central
> >> relay is running on kn-200 BASE. When I connect to the relay point
> >> via my
> >> laptop I am lucky to see 800K to 1.2MB/S over the net transfers.
> >> Using the
> >> ping fill utility I measure that the transfer rates from the RG1000
> >> SAT to
> >> the KN-200 is an average of 3.2 with a max of 3.6MB/S over the air.
> >> According to the ping fill this should should be sufficent to cary my
> >> 3MB/S
> >> feed but I am not seeing it at the central relay not even half of it.
> >>
> >> I asked Karlnet support about it and they said that is normal because
> >> the
> >> ping fill shows round trip so my 3.2 to 3.6MB/S transfer to the relay
> >> point
> >> should on support 1.6 to 1.8MB/S one way (Even though there not even
> >> seeing
> >> that much). I questioned this and never received a reply back. On our
> >> main
> >> tower which is still on a T1 I have my home connection to the main
> >> tower via
> >> ping fill shows my average transfer time of 1,271,009 and max of
> >> 1,484,160.
> >> Now if we took the half duplex analogy to mean this result is round
> >> trip and
> >> my connection according to ping fill and karlnet should only handle
> >> 630K -
> >> 742K either up or down, correct? But if this is true then why is it I
> >> can
> >> register on the bandwidth testing sites using this same connection
> >> double
> >> that actually about what the ping fill says? My average over the net
> >> connection rating is 1.2MB/S ... Does anyone else have any
> >> information on
> >> the actuall ping fill and if it even works right at all? If the above
is
> >> true then my 3.2-3.6MB/S link to the relay is accurate should get me my
> >> 3MB/S feed there with no problem.
> >>
> >> I cant get answers from karlnet support, does anyone have a clue here?
> >>
> >> Is anyone else using Karlnet for backhauling locations? Are you able to
> >> backhaul more than a T1?
> >>
> >> Thank You,
> >> John
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Karlnet mailing list
> >> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|