Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] SWR and line length, etc.

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc.
From: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 10:44:27 -0400
On Monday, October 04, 1999 9:54 AM, Pete Smith
[SMTP:n4zr@contesting.com] wrote:
> >You can tune around for minimum swr, but that doesn't guarantee you
are
> >at resonance.
> 
> I think that the indicated SWR minimum will always correspond to zero
> reactance.
> 

Hmm.  Me thinks you are right.
For a given resistive part, adding any reactive component takes you
outside the SWR circle for the resistive part alone (SWR goes up).
Therefore, SWR minimum occurs at the zero reactive point.

I should have said that your minimum SWR is not necessarily at 50 +j0
ohms and therefore not necessarily 1:1.

I'll understand this, if it's the last thing I do.
This can be a great reflector and I still have some skin (we'll see how
long that lasts, hi).

> 
> 73,  Pete N4ZR

73
Mike
N2MG

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>