To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc. |
From: | jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden) |
Date: | Mon, 4 Oct 99 12:09:12 -0500 |
Gilmer, Mike wrote: >What I was trying to describe, and I believe Pete understood it be, was >the case of having some arbitrary fixed load impedance and changing >frequency (tuning around) to look for a dip in VSWR. Pete said that the >minimum would occur at zero reactance. OK. I understand what you are saying now. But I think a more accurate way to describe it would be to say minimum reactance (obviously zero reactance is a minimum). If you have a fixed antenna and a fixed length of feedline and are tuning around looking for a dip, that dip may or may not occur at a point of zero reactance but I would guess it certainly would occur at a point of minimum reactance. > >Also, minimum SWR, in some arbitrary cable/load system, may not be at >the center. True. 73, Jon KE9NA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Second Amendment is NOT about duck hunting! Jon Ogden jono@enteract.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc., Gilmer, Mike |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz., Vic Rosenthal |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc., Gilmer, Mike |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc., Jon Ogden |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |