Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] RG6 Power Handling

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] RG6 Power Handling
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:39:29 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I use RG-142 at 1500 watts RTTY on all bands.

And either RG-174 non Teflon; or RG316 Teflon for the input stuff. Either works just great. I like the Teflon stuff because it doesn't melt while soldering.
You have to be a bit careful with RG-174.

73
Jim W7RY



-----Original Message----- From: Larry Benko
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 10:53 AM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] RG6 Power Handling

Hmmmmm!  Re-reading the original post I made an assumption that may or
may not be correct.  I assumed the coax was to be used at the output
side where it would be subject to the full amplifier power. If that is
the case, then RG-142 or RG-400 would be about the only choices for
small diameter high power coax.

However on the input side of the amp RG-142 would be a poor choice for
reasons of flexibility and cost.  For low power RG-174 (PE) (200W avg. @
30MHz) or RG-316 (Teflon) (1.1kW avg @ 30MHz) would be better.  Last
time I checked, RG-178 was more expensive than RG-316 even though it is
smaller.  I can't find power ratings for RG-178 but would guess it would
easily handle a couple hundred watts average since it is the same
construction as RG-316.

73,
Larry, W0QE


On 6/19/2014 11:34 AM, Carl wrote:
Not very flexible.

Low power circuits can use RG-174 or 178.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Benko" <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] RG6 Power Handling


RG-142 (50 ohm)

Same size as RG-58 and rated at 30MHz 1:1 SWR of 3.1KW average power

Larry, W0QE

On 6/19/2014 10:22 AM, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:
Hi all,

what 50Ω coax cable would be recommended for the internal wiring of a compact 160-10m legal limit amplifier? I'm looking for a cable thinner than RG-8, much more flexible, non-foam (to avoid de-centering in bends), and that can be purchased easily in small quantities. Of course, it must handle the power, even with a slightly elevated SWR, without overheating.

Suggestions are welcome!

Manfred


========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3972/7706 - Release Date: 06/19/14




_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>