CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics

To: Maurizio Panicara <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics
From: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:15:05 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Mauri:

I certainly do not share this impression.   It can be debated whether
packet assistance actually helps.  Personally, I think the higher scores
are due to better operating skills and stations.

I do not believe that most of the high-scoring single operators
are cheating by using packet and claiming unassisted.  I
certainly don't believe it is true of the ones I know personally.

73,

Mark, KD4D



> 
> I've the perception that excluding newbies, casuals and purists at
> first point, the rest of people when watching at results believes that
> higher unassisted scores are consequence to the second way of
> operating.
> 
> ...just my (euro) cent.
> 
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>