On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:15:05 +0000, kd4d@comcast.net <kd4d@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Mauri:
>
> I certainly do not share this impression. It can be debated whether
> packet assistance actually helps. Personally, I think the higher scores
> are due to better operating skills and stations.
It has been verified in a MM or MS that packet finally hepls a lot if
properly used, although skills and stations always make the
difference.
The rulement of better skills and stations plays its role, but in a plain field.
At present, a plain field is not enforced at all, beeing only left at
individual will.
> I do not believe that most of the high-scoring single operators
> are cheating by using packet and claiming unassisted. I
> certainly don't believe it is true of the ones I know personally.
I stay on my own, and as i do, a lot of people do believe the
opposite. Something should be done, but know that anyway I have the
greatest respect for those who really play unassisted, even if they
don't win.
73,
Mauri I4JMY
> 73,
>
> Mark, KD4D
>
>
>
>
> >
> > I've the perception that excluding newbies, casuals and purists at
> > first point, the rest of people when watching at results believes that
> > higher unassisted scores are consequence to the second way of
> > operating.
> >
> > ...just my (euro) cent.
> >
> > 73,
> > Mauri I4JMY
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|