Hi Mauri:
I think we'll just have to agree to disagree. :-) However, M/M
is a much different animal than single op and I do believe that
packet helps us at W3LPL for instance.
I do NOT condone cheating by monitoring packet clusters and
claiming unassisted...I just don't believe very many of the top
unassisted operators are doing it.
73,
Mark, KD4D
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:15:05 +0000, kd4d@comcast.net <kd4d@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> It has been verified in a MM or MS that packet finally hepls a lot if
> properly used, although skills and stations always make the
> difference.
> The rulement of better skills and stations plays its role, but in a plain
> field.
> At present, a plain field is not enforced at all, beeing only left at
> individual will.
>
> > I do not believe that most of the high-scoring single operators
> > are cheating by using packet and claiming unassisted. I
> > certainly don't believe it is true of the ones I know personally.
>
> I stay on my own, and as i do, a lot of people do believe the
> opposite. Something should be done, but know that anyway I have the
> greatest respect for those who really play unassisted, even if they
> don't win.
>
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY
>
> > 73,
> >
> > Mark, KD4D
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I've the perception that excluding newbies, casuals and purists at
> > > first point, the rest of people when watching at results believes that
> > > higher unassisted scores are consequence to the second way of
> > > operating.
> > >
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Mauri I4JMY
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|