| To: | Gerry Hull <gerry@w1ve.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 |
| From: | "Chris (DL8MBS)" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:11:38 +0200 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Gerry Hull wrote: >I believe there are very legitimate "real-radio" reasons for remote receivers > Maybe you should quote a few here going beyond logging 240 Zones during CQWW (with your call on the Xtreme-reflector for sharing receivers in a worldwide community it should be possible - perhaps even with only 5 watts on both sides). Or is it already a "real-radio" reason to log DX-stations on 160m with qrp on both sides during daylight hours (possible with reasonable located remote receivers)? 73, Chris (www.dl8mbs.de) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22(simple), Joe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving contesting (was Extreme), David Levine |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22, Gerry Hull |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22, Gerry Hull |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |