CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change

To: Luc PY8AZT <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change
From: k3bu@optimum.net
Reply-to: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:00:56 +0000 (GMT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Plus, especially in Eu, HQ stations park high power CQer machines across the 
band leaving few "clear" frequencies for little and medium pistols. 
HQ multiplier = baaad idea.
 
Yuri K3BU.us
www.MVmanor.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Luc PY8AZT 
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009 7:49 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change
To: RT Clay , cq-contest@contesting.com

> 2009/12/2 RT Clay :
> > Additionally removing HQ's as mults would really make the IARU 
> more geographically fair, but I doubt that is going to happen.
> 
> The proliferation of stations decreased HQ unit value of the
> multiplier. This has changed the strategy of competition. Who is
> closer to the places with high density of stations HQ wins.
> 
> -- 
> 73, Luc
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>