To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change |
From: | Zoli Pitman HA1AG <ha1ag@hg6n.hu> |
Reply-to: | ha1ag@hg6n.hu |
Date: | Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:38:54 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
: > Plus, especially in Eu, HQ stations park high power CQer machines across the > band leaving few "clear" frequencies for little and medium pistols. > HQ multiplier = baaad idea. > > Yuri K3BU > > HQ / band mult is a bad idea. HQ meaning 12 simultaneous TXs across a country is a bad idea, too. exactly for the same reason you gave. HQ should be 1 station, counted onceas mult and life would be back to normal. Even DA0HQ couldn't make a difference by making 1000 DL QSOs in midsummer on 160m. :-) 73, zoli ha1ag _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Albert Crespo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW scoring rules change, wally |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change, Gerry Lynch |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change, Frank Hunt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |