Right, I know that can not be easily verified. But it is the "Spirit"
of the rules. If the rules say it is to be one thing or another and
not just a random number, then it should be one of those two numbers
and nothing else it is in the rules is it not?
Just an amateur code of ethics thing to me. it's a rule, so it's a rule.
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 11/9/2011 10:29 AM, Dale Putnam wrote:
> And who checks the validity of that number.... and why?
>
> --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy
>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:53:31 -0600
> > From: nss@mwt.net
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange
> >
> >
> > On 11/9/2011 3:24 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
> > > In the ARRL Contest Update for November 9, Larry K5OT,
> > > the ARRL SS manager, is quoted as saying "according to
> > > Sweepstakes rule 4.3 you must include your full call
> > > sign in the exchange".
> >
> > And as usual That rule is broken just like the CK is constantly being
> > broken. It is a NUMBER that is one of two possible numbers. NOT any
> > number you choose to use.
> >
> > Joe WB9SBD
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|