>From K5AF
FYI, here is what I posted in my 3830 writeup, FWIW. I posted this before I
realized there was a thread started on CQ-Contest.
"Same old irritant! We need to make a rule that when running, stations
must
identify a minimum of every third QSO, or face being penalized. I don't
like
the thought of "contest police", but we certainly could flag some of the
offenders and take a look at the recorded spectrum to verify who the
culprits
are. I am sure that the dupe rates for everyone would go down, scores
would go
up, and we wouldn't have as many "hornets nests" across the spectrum.
Overall,
it would make life much better for everyone."
In a message dated 11/28/2011 1:16:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,
w7why@frontier.com writes:
Hi Ron
True, but if someone is sending '5nn23', I'd sure like to know who it is.
If they are sending '5nn13', I'd probably not be all that excited and move
on. 73
Tom W7WHY
Ron said:
"If you don't know who they are, don't call them.
If, as a S&P station, you don't want to wait for an ID, move on to work
someone else."
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|