CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID

To: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID
From: Jeffrey Embry <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>
Reply-to: jeffrey.embry@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:32:24 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I give them 4 QSO.  Sticking around just to find out they would be a dupe
is painful.

73,

Jeff
K3OQ

On Friday, November 1, 2013, Zack Widup wrote:

> Yes, if a station doesn't ID in three QSO's I spin the dial.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On 10/31/13, Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > It appears to me that many of the big rare contest stations are
> maximizing
> > their rates by never IDing as long as there are enough assisted guys
> calling
> > who already know who they are. This makes classic S&P particularly
> agonizing
> > and IMO all running stations should be required to ID at least once every
> > some number of Qs. I realize that assisted is a different category, but
> the
> > guys out there who don't play my computer vs yours will continue to
> diminish
> > in number if it's no fun...
> >
> > 73 HS0ZIA
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


-- 
Jeff Embry, K3OQ
FM19nb
ARCI #11643, FPQRP #-696,
QRP-L # 67, NAQCC #25, ARS #1733
AMSAT LM-2263

--
WWWDWOA?
(What Would We Do Without Acronyms?)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>